Mike's Home Page

Cancelled Show
Mar 12, 202007:20PM

Category: General

I loaded up the trailer and rolled to the fairgrounds for the Indy 1500 Gun and Knife Show.  My friend Jack, there to help, runs over and warns me not to unload.

It seems they were waiting for word on whether or not the show would go on. They'd been calling the fairgrounds all week, and told things were fine. Then, suddenly, there's debate. After we all arrive, but not after we start setup at least. And I'm local (well, under 50 miles), so there's that.

We hang around waiting, along with the Flower and Patio Show people, and I understand why the governor had pause. Who wants 10,000 Angry Karens calling your office to complain?

Ultimately, he even stayed late to ponder this matter, because the notification of closure came down at 1626.

Show is cancelled.  At least it's early spring, not the Comic Con, the race, or GenCon.

Since I'm not a morally bankrupt, mentally retarded, intellectually corrupt, pathetic pussy, I'm not blaming the President for this.

There's a good chance in a month it will all be a bunch of nothing. If so, it's because action like this mitigated the threat, not because the threat didn't exist.

Meantime, I have lots of stuff to sell online. I have wares if you have coin.

Real Swamp Draining
Feb 24, 202012:36AM

Category: Politics

It's hilarious when Demorrhoids and complete shitheads (But I repeat myself) attempt to claim that libertarians (Which I'm not) are somehow magically fascist or Nazi, which they claim are the same thing, while totally not being the same as their own fetishized version of a totalitarian police state.

A like-minded fellow vet and I were kicking around what we'd do if ever elected president (I'm an immigrant, so I'd have to be Benevolent Dictator).

Day 1:  Vacation of federal sentences with full pardons:

Anyone in jail on a drug charge that doesn't involve selling to minors.  Your sentence is vacated. You are pardoned.  Go engage in free market economics. This also applies to bootleggers, distillers, and anyone with a liquor license violation.

Anyone in jail on a non-violent firearm charge.  Your sentence is vacated. You are pardoned.  

Anyone in jail for a crime involving consenting adults (strippers, prostitutes, etc).  Your sentence is vacated. You are pardoned.  

Anyone who accepted a plea deal in lieu of a bunch of intimidating bullshit by the government's official jack-booted death squad and its legal apparatus:  Pardoned for the pled crime. If the Feds, State or Locals want to try again on an actual charge they think they can prove, that's up to them. Though if it's a drug or firearm charge, they may want to save their time and money.  

Tax evaders:  Sentences commuted.  IRS can hire collection agents like every other debt.

Every government agency will be instructed to continue Trump's policy of removing two regulations for every new regulation. In addition, they will be ordered to commence an immediate 10% reduction in personnel via attrition--retirement, dismissal, resignation, etc. If they need to fire additional drones to make it happen, fine. Last hired, first fired. If this means some department heads have to move back into customer service and deal with actual people, good. Oh, that's 10% per year. I want them 2/3 their current size within four years. That puts them at 43% in 8 years. Though I'd consider upping the rate to 20% for a second term. DoD and the Judiciary can petition for exceptions on a case by case basis. We would probably say no.

Only three federal agencies get to be armed:  FBI, ICE, and the Marshals.  Any agency that believes it needs armed force can call the ever-decreasing number of Marshals and request to be on the waiting list.  ICE actually needs armed guards at the border.  The FBI can arm agents who actually deal with actual criminals--terrorists, kidnappers, traffickers.

The Civilian Marksmanship Program would be immediately budgeted and instructed to update from M-1 Garands and sell AR-15s at cost to the American public.  Some of the money saved elsewhere would be used to expand shooting range access in every county. Congress would be instructed to repeal the NFA if they know what's good for them.

~~

I'm sure some "liberal" will be along momentarily to tardsplain how this is actually racist and fascist and I should be hanged from a gas station for dismantling the bureaucracy that makes us free.

Which is why I pretty much stopped bothering listening to anything from the American left.

How To Spot Totalitarianism
Feb 24, 202012:01AM

Category: Politics

If I actually express my personal opinion of the below person, his fellow travelers, who have already had several of my social media accounts silenced, attempted to ban my books and attempted to SWAT me will probably threaten my kids again.  So I'll be as moderate as I can.

 

https://twitter.com/walshfreedom/status/1231392007135907840?s=21
Joe Walsh

@WalshFreedom

I would vote for socialism over authoritarianism.

 

~

Imagine being so fucking pighead stupid that you don’t realize it’s the same thing.

As noted by these commenters:

Carmine Sabia

@CarmineSabia

Feb 22

Replying to

@WalshFreedom

Socialism is totalitarianism. You are not even you anymore. This is the worst case of grifting I have ever seen.

 

 

In Pursuit of Truth

@IPOT1776

·

20h

Replying to

@WalshFreedom

We know. Which is why things have turned out for you the way they have.

 

Yuri Pavlov

@yuri_pavlov74

·

19h

The funny thing is socialism is a euphemism for communism which is a euphemism for authoritarianism. That’s ironic-ism.

 ~

To which this creature replied:

~Devon Welsh - Bernie Sanders 2020
@devonwelsh
·
14h
Can you please read up on the terms "socialism" and "totalitarianism"? Even just the Wikipedia articles for each one would help you understand how different and even radically opposed those two ideas are.

~~


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism Yes, this says Socialists can be totalitarian, you lying, retarded, subhuman communist piece of shit.

It even provides a list. Most of them are socialist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_totalitarian_regimes

Gee. Even Wikipoo can't hide THAT truth in leftist weasel-wording.

~~

Round Two:

Anyone reading me regularly knows I've been quite critical of Trump. He's managed to be not as bad as Hillary Clinton, the actual National Socialist, but it's a low bar.

But the "authoritarian" line, while accurate, fails at all to be scaled.  If you have anarchist me at 0% government, Trump is around 35%, Bloomberg is around 65%, and the Demorrhoid Party is pretending it's not already around 80%, cheering itself on to slide to 146%

There's the utterly ridiculous comparison to Hitler, which has been bandied about regarding almost every recent president, but in actuality is only accurate regarding FDR, who near as I can tell wanted Adolph to swing by and fuck him across the bed in an orgy of mutual anti-semitism, race hatred and eugenics.

Some things Hitler did:

Price fixing

Sanctions against LGBTs

Sanctions against Jews

Death Camps

Nationalized single payer health care

Nationalized industry

Started a world war

Banned gun ownership along racial lines

Universal gun licensing for citizens

Colluded with Russia

Instituted a military draft

Allied with Arab militants

Developed a national secret police

Banned political dissent

Sent thugs around to smash dissenters and their businesses

 

~
Donald Trump, for all his faults, has done none of these.

 

 

Though the Demorrhoid Party either has previously, has as its platform, or openly endorses:

Price fixing

Sanctions against Israel

Nationalized single payer health care

Started US involvement in two world wars

Banned gun ownership along racial lines

Universal gun licensing for citizens

Colluded with the USSR

Instituted AND re-instituted the draft

Openly courts Arab militants

Openly pushes for national secret police AND has de facto created them under the table

Uses its propaganda arm (the media) to stifle dissent.

Publicly endorses thugs who go around smashing dissenters and their businesses.


So, gee, which party has all the authoritarian trappings AND violence of both the Nazis and the Communists?

Yeah, the fucking Demorrhoid Party.

They are Literally Hitler, while accusing everyone else of being so.  (Including me. Apparently, actual anarchists who despise the existence of government secretly want A REPRESSIVE GOVERNMENT!  Paid for by ABSOLUTELY NO TAXES!  With the power to DO NOTHING! Except repress people by inaction!)

I'll probably get pre-banned from another convention for this, because two things Demorrhoids can't stand are redpill truth and public dissent.


 

 

Brad Smith <bradsmith313@gmail.com>
8:05 PM (42 minutes ago)
to me

The only racists are those in the GOP and Libertarian Party who fight to honor a regime whose goals were to uphold white supremacists and oppress blacks.
Fuck off.

Mike Williamson
8:47 PM (0 minutes ago)
to Brad

Um...what is this about, and whom was it intended for? Because I have no idea who you are.

You're also wrong, since no such set of parameters and people exists.  But obviously, deductive reasoning is not your strong suit.

If it was intended at me, I note that you're anti-immigrant, but that's a common issue I deal with from "liberals."

~~~

Let's deconstruct his utter ignorance here:

Republicans and Libertarians are not the same group.  They're vastly different groups. Anyone lumping them together has to be so far from the mainstream that their only discernment is "us" and "them."

The US has never had a "Regime."

No one is "fighting" to "Honor" said regime, even using the loosest definition of same.

I think he may vaguely be referencing the Confederacy (Not a "Regime"), which is long gone, and was run very much by elitist democrats, who can be typified by Mike Bloomberg (D--Wall Street), who believes poor people should have their lives controlled because they're too stupid to manage them themselves, and by Demorrhoids who insist that voter ID is racist because blacks are too stupid to get ID (which almost everyone of every demographic already has, and by omitting the poverty-stricken whites, Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans make it clear they think ONLY blacks have this problem, thus demonstrating exactly the point that THEY are the racists).

If so, the LP would have nothing to do with the Confederacy due to slavery, et al.  And I've never once heard a Republican insist we need to bring back slavery. But damned if the Demorrhoids don't do everything they can to have an impoverished underclass they can order around, especially if they can keep them without immigration papers and working for a pittance (See: Much of the Hollywood elite and scads of politicians).

So all I'm getting is that this guy is ignorant and angry that his own side's racism and elitism are so blatant.  But rather than try to fix them, he wants to project them onto normal people.

 

 

28 Feb: near Nashville, at Oleg Volk's.

29 Feb: through Chattanooga and Atlanta, stopping in Tifton, GA.

1 Mar:  Through Jacksonville to Canaveral.

2 Mar: Early morning SpaceX launch, proceeding to Miami area.

3 Mar: Touring some USCG facilities, proceeding through swamp.

4 Mar: Signing books at Books at Park Place in St Petersburg, stopping in the Tampa area.

5 Mar: Tyndall Air Force Base.

6 Mar: Pensacola and hypothetically Mobile, AL.

I can meet up with people at actual stopping points--restaurants near my lodging, private homes, etc.  I can't make a lot of stops en route except for close friends.

Drop me an email, and I'm also creating a thread under this post on my official FB author page.

 

Bill's Politipalooza

Yesterday at 10:30 AM · 

There are very legitimate arguments against Medicare for All. I am against M4A and am very happy to explain why. However, new government expenses and taxes aren't really among the reasons. It's super hard to see a cancer patient holding a 6-figure bill and then complain about my taxes going up. It's super hard to see the $trillions spent on needless war and then complain about new government spending on its citizens. Lastly, when neither party gives a damn about debt and deficit, I simply cannot talk about the expense of M4A with a straight face. Fiscal sustainability is problematic with M4A, but it is a weak argument for most Americans given the current reality. I believe there are solutions far better than M4A, but let's debate them and stop thinking its a mic-drop moment when you ask to see the price tag. It's not!

~~~

Sure it is. I can hand you a million dollar bill for a dying kid every ten seconds. If you care about these people, you'll pay it, right?

Every person starts with a responsibility to themselves, their immediate family and friends, then their neighborhood, community, politic, and species in that order.

If you place the charity of random strangers above your own immediate circle, you are generous, but also a drain on on your own resources, and you will run out of them in short order.

Not every problem in the world is your problem or my problem. That is a harsh reality.

Is it reasonable to support your immediate circles? Yes, because you will gain similar benefit in response. Is it reasonable to offer some limited support further out, as available? Absolutely. Should you starve your own family to do so? Well, you can, but I won't.

Literally anyone can write a check to the Dept of Health and Human Services, or any other gov't agency, and it will be cashed. Demands for legislative force mean those people want SOMEONE ELSE to be made to donate, not themselves. You can find plenty of news stories about it, too. "I didn't think _my_ taxes would go up!" They voted for SOMEONE ELSE to get screwed out of resources.

If you go to the bank and say, "I need a loan for a new roof," you'll probably get it. The infrastructure helps your family and its economics. If you say, "I need to borrow $10,000 to give to some kid with cancer in Kansas," they're going to refuse, and they should. Taxes, especially deficits, should be going for critical societal needs such as infrastructure and defense. Charity is a luxury a wealthy nation can afford to a certain degree. The nation that mandates it as a non-discretionary entitlement, while considering infrastructure and defense to be discretionary, is on the slope to destruction.

Then there's the reality that the same government that spends $500 on hammers, denies painkillers to cancer patients, and negligently exposed at least 6000 veterans to HIV shouldn't be making ANY health care decisions.

 

 This isn't even offensive to or about anything.  It's a pun. Which, granted, should be punished, but not by banning.

The furthest back anyone got me was a for a three year old comment, but I've seen bans for 4 and 6 year old content.

Can everyone with a brain agree:

Past a month, the worst that should happen is the post is removed.

If it's not an actual threat, actual porn vs nudity, it should stand.

That while Nazis, Communists, Fascists and other left wingers are subhuman shit, they retain the same right to free speech as human beings.

That mocking them, or any other group, is not actually harmful in any way, and is the whole point of that concept of freedom of expression.

And that if some pathetic pussy little gamma bitch is offended and whines, they should simply be blocked from the account in question, so they won't be offended anymore. (This is what happens at www.MeWe.com if you report something.)

Does anyone think the above is not reasonable?

And yet, if someone were to explain that to the Cockzucker, using a ball bat until his cranial intestines leaked onto the sidewalk, rather than the public benefactor they actually would be, they'd be considered a criminal.

And thus, western civilization is doomed by "tolerant" "liberals" who can tolerate anything except dissent or humor.

Over here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834976033333570/permalink/1511454445685722/

"Conservatives are still outraged over a same-sex kiss."

No, not really, liberal boy. Few of them ever were.

Either the character, having the memories of all previous hosts, is completely bisexual and relaxed about it. Or there's some hormonal/chemical factor in the host that makes them monosexual. Either way it should have been a nonissue as of the 3rd episode. It was you liberals who milked it for ad dollars.

DS9 did not start becoming anything even remotely approximating Good until the staff writers looked at the path Joe Straczynski was blazing, and said: "Hey -- Star Trek has never tried Actual Continuity before; let's give it a shot."  Until then, all the show was known for was having a species whose defining features were "short; big ears; crooked teeth; odd headgear; obsessed with money", in accordance with The Protocols Of The Elders Of Science Fiction...

You beat us about the head with every "marginalized" group, in a universe where allegedly these things don't matter.

This is yet another reason why "liberals" should refrain from science fiction.  They really can't envision a universe outside their narrow little shell of hatred and prejudice.

You may have noticed I've not been on Fecesbook for a while.  Let me explain...no, let me SHOW you why:

So um, mocking the Nazis and the Stalinists as murderous regimes, which they provably were, is "Hate speech."

Posting a link to an article about an uncontacted tribe is "nudity."

Posting links to a very serious publication like "Nature," or making a political comment is "Spam." And in the second example, they didn't even tell me what I'd posted that was alleged to be "Spam."

Note that the "spam" is still "pending review" nine months later.  This is why I have multiple backup accounts. Yes, that's against their rules.  They can fuck themselves with their rules. This has happened over 100 times, and I've lost count.

I can't share the article of a legal foundation because they claim it's "controversial" to oppose the government.  Gee, it's almost as if they have a political axe to grind.

Since I can't even post news links about certain subjects:

I can't even guess what this one is about.

My wife, an IT security professional, notes that she stops getting notifications about my posts about 24 hours before these things happen.

I have several stalkers, and at least one of them works for Fecesbook in an administrative capacity. They've even blocked me from asking for review:

And sometimes I don't even get told what I'm being banned for:

And in messages, quoting Bill Clinton verbatim is "Harmful content."

So they win.  I can't appeal to their rules, which change constantly anyway, and which they are manipulating against me.  Don't waste time suggesting a lawyer--the Cockzucker only responds to court orders from CA courts, which I can't afford. Even though someone or a group of someone's is obsessive enough about me to sift back through comments I made literally three years ago to ban me. http://www.michaelzwilliamson.com/blog/index.php?itemid=369 

When I had a Twitter account, similar things happened there.  I may have a screenshot back in the archive, but what's the point?

You may recall multiple Wikipoo editors all "Spontaneously" and simultaneously decided to speedy delete my page as "not notable," despite 2 genre and 9 national bestsellers, and several awards and noms, plus GoH appearances. They also went after Tom Kratman, Brad Torgersen, Sarah Hoyt, were trying to pull down bits of John Ringo's background, probably with the intent of claiming a multiple NYT bestseller is not notable, and even in discussion claimed that "Baen is basically a vanity publisher."

It would be ridiculous to believe there's any sort of conspiracy going on here.  Not at all. But the pile of coincidences makes presence on several platforms very inconvenient.

There's an irony that the Cockzucker is quoted here https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-lost-notebook/ as saying: “Would you want every joke that you made to someone being printed and taken out of context later?” and “Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.”

Well done, Cockzucker!  You said the right things.  You never intended to abide by them, but you did say them.

Moving forward, the only things I'll post on Fecesbook will be publication updates and stuff for sale. There's no point wasting time on anything else that will be used to harass me further.

However, if you follow me over to www.mewe.com you'll get first updates and dibs on my projects, and as a bonus, I can post all the unmutual humor I never even bothered to risk on Fecesbook, knowing the Butthurt Little Bitch Brigade would wet their panties.

In the aftermath of the non-issue in Virginia, I have a few notes.

Before we get started, even the actual left media agrees with me that "liberals" are racist: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/08/white-liberal-racism-why-progressives-are-unable-to-see-their-own-bigotry.html 

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/10-ways-white-liberals-pe_b_8068136 

~~

First, VCDL does this every year. If you don't know who they are, or that this is an annual event, you're not qualified to hold an opinion. It's a (sort of slightly) free country, so you can express your opinion, but anyone educated should laugh at you.

Here's some examples of the idiocy I found where idiots hang out, meaning Twitter, but also a bit on Farcebook.

"Most of the protesters are white!"  Most of Virginia's population is white. But go ahead and ignore the many black, Chinese-American, Hispanic, and other patriots who where there. I guess they're only "marginalized" when they're on your side, otherwise, they don't exist.  If you're racist, that is.

"They're all racists!"  Hey, you're the people who elected Governor Blackface Whitehood, and are having extra state police work on MLK day, AND requiring city and county police to do so, too.  But everyone else are racist? Cool story, bro! I hope you're convincing yourself.

"GOA is just a group for white gun nuts."  So you're completely ignoring their communication director, Antonia Okafor. https://gunowners.org/antonia-okafor/ 

Well, okay, racist.

Oh, here's some more: 

 

 

There are thousands more, if you care to look, and don't MARGINALIZE them.

"Haha! These gun nuts are mostly fat and ugly!" Fatshaming and Lookshaming. Very liberal. Also, body armor literally adds 35 lbs, plus bulk for cold weather clothing.

"Why aren't they at work?"  It's a holiday. Lots of them have it off, or took a day off. Did you forget it was Dr Martin Luther King, Jr Day?  If so, it's probably because you're a racist.

"Hey, it's illegal to wear a mask!"  They're wearing the same masks the police wearing, because it is cold. Somehow, you never complain about this when it's your terrorist Antifag buddies doing it.

"Wow, they're wearing military clothing!" Actually, in that picture, those are Carhart coveralls used in cold weather by people who actually work for a living, including city workers, construction workers, and line workers. You know: All the working class people you elitist liberal cocksuckers like to pretend don't exist, or if you acknowledge they do, that they're stupid because they don't have a degree in Agenda Studies.

"The police weren't taking them down like they do other groups!"  Gee, it's almost as if being armed causes the government to take you more seriously and its agents to be reluctant to get force turned on them. And of course, they were completely peaceful. If only we could make that work for, I don't know, MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES.  It worked for Malcolm X.

"March to the nearest recruitment center." A huge number of them are vets. Also, nice endorsement of the military industrial complex and police state. Sieg Heil, you fucking Nazi.

"There were very few police present. Because they're white." Actually, there were THOUSANDS of police present, but since these were decent human beings, not the sort of subhuman shit who beat people with bike locks, throw milkshakes at them like 1950s racists, set things on fire, or attack cops, the police didn't need to do anything. Once again you're proving the point:  The very diverse group you insist is only "white males" is a largely peaceful group. For now.

"Haha! These people aren't scary at all!" Thanks for admitting it. So why do you want to restrict their rights and piss them off?

"All this over background checks!"  That is about the most monstrous lie possible, and this is going to take a bit:

Let's start with non-gun laws, since that might actually affect a liberal pinbrain: They're proposing that recall require 25% of ELIGIBLE VOTERS on a petition. Not actual voters or even registered. So, more people than ever actually vote for a candidate.

They're proposing an 8 year term for their pet governor.

They're proposing the same racist bullshit that "black people don't know how to get voter ID"--the same ID everyone uses to drive, buy smokes, and buy beer, so they can pack more illegal votes in. There's literally no reason to oppose voter ID, as is used in every civilized nation, unless you're a racist trying to pack an election...for that 8 year governor. (And keep in mind, at some point, a Republican might become governor, and then the problem is the other way.  Of course, expecting "liberals" to even comprehend what a second order effect is, much less predict them, is like expecting a pig to grasp calculus.)

The governor was able to claim "social media comments" as a "public emergency," and declare 14 acres of empty public ground an "emergency shelter" where no weapons were allowed.  The courts refused to stop this.  At this point he can literally declare the entire state such.

There's a bill that calling a public employee and obscene name would constitute a "threat." So if you inform Governor Blackface Whitehood of the fact that he's a cocksucking Nazi piece of shit, you'd go to jail.  Hey, Demorrhoids prove they want the First Amendment gone, too.  Awkward. Except, of course, there has NEVER been a Demorrhoid who supported free speech. They want free speech for THEM, but not for anyone who might disagree with their Nazi ideology. (Yes, if you belong to the Democratic Party, you ARE a fucking Nazi, and you ARE a fucking racist piece of shit.)(And almost certainly Anti-Semitic, too.) (I've proven this before: http://www.michaelzwilliamson.com/blog/index.php?itemid=489 http://www.michaelzwilliamson.com/blog/index.php?itemid=473 )

And see the opening note.

Nevermind "background checks," they proposed banning several categories of firearms, which does in fact constitute, "Taking the guns," and massive restrictions on a right, and have already cancelled their recognition of 25 states' reciprocal licenses to carry. What those states should do is cancel recognition of VA driver and marriage licenses.

Possibly the scariest is a "voluntary" list to be a non-gun person, which if you violate, constitutes a crime.  If you don't want a gun, just don't buy a fucking gun.  Why sign up to make yourself a criminal?  To address this, we need to consider what "voluntary" means.  It means a lot like "elective" abortion.  In most cases, you can "elect" to abort, or either die in childbirth or give birth to a poor creature that dies in agony.

You'll "volunteer" to be a non-gun owner who can be charged as a criminal if you do when your employer, or their insurer, tells you it's a condition of employment to "reduce workplace violence." (It won't. If you believe it will, you're fucking stupid. And don't bother arguing, I know more about this subject than you do.)  You can  "Volunteer" to not own guns or volunteer to starve.  Or when the divorce judge tells you custody depends on "volunteering" for this list. Or the traffic court.  Or the school you wish to attend.

Then they'll trumpet that X% or X number of Virginians "voluntarily" don't own guns, as if that matters for the practice of a right. (How many of you have ever actually written a letter to your Congressleech? Does that mean free speech doesn't exist?) They'll use that for marketing elsewhere.

Also, the bill would make it a crime to let someone on the list handle weapons.  So this will be used to harass and arrest honest people who get entrapped.

A bill that would require ANYONE selling guns or ammo to ensure EVERY employee can pass a background check. Now, this sounds reasonable, but is in fact already federal law...for people who actually transact firearms.  But what this would mean is that WalMart couldn't just designate five people in Sporting Goods as the FFL section, cleared by ATF, as they do now. Literally EVERY FUCKING EMPLOYEE down to the night janitor would have to pass a background check.  Which of course means the store will stop selling guns. Which of course means inexpensive guns will be less available to minorities and marginalized communities at risk of violence.

Note that last:  Literally EVERYTHING the Demorrhoids push for is a long game to get back the slaves we forcibly made them give up in the Civil War. They want minorities poor, helpless, and dependent on the government. Any minority who forgets their place is scorned as an "Uncle Tom" or "Sellout" or even "House ni__r."  Such tolerant, peaceful people Demorrhoids are.

So, yeah, go ahead with your racism, lies, and hatred about everyone involved in a peaceful protest.

But, since we know you're the fucking Nazis now, expect to get treated like fucking Nazis next time. Hopefully the guillotine won't be in effigy: 

"They didn't actually start any violence, so we win!"  Noted for next time. We'll bring live ammo.

"Better luck next time!"  Oh, don't worry, cockbag. Next time, we won't make that "peaceful" mistake again.

You are the racists, you are the liars, and we know who you are.

~~~

But let's be honest:

The ballot box failed. The soap box is irrelevant when the left controls the media. The courts have said pretty much any gun control is A-OK, and SCOTUS has refused to hear the appeals.

And a bunch of guncucks paraded around and did nothing after the Delegates proposed stealing their property and installing themselves for life.

It’s been time for the Ammo Box since the 18th Amendment. We need to just admit that 95% of gun owners are pussies, and the 5% who might start something know the 95% would go Full Virtue Signal, and turn them in while shrieking, “They’re not law abiding gun owners!” The number of cucks online insisting, "Well, why don't you start it?"  Even if I could, what would be the point? You'd play their game.

The building was empty. You could have stormed the building, set up shop peacefully, and had the crowd outside bring you pizza and beer, and still been there, forcing the Nazis to hold their legislative session in a conference hall, humiliated before the world.

You could have separated the barricades from inside or out, and put 20,000 people inside the barricades, no violence, just civil disobedience the way Ghandi intended. Go where they say you can't. Say what they prohibit.

Hell, if the badly outnumbered cops looked itchy, you could have made it very clear they were being disarmed for their own safety and sent home.

Nope, you paraded around and did nothing, told everyone how peaceful you were, not like the fascists at Antifa, and made it clear you'll politely line up for the box cars when it's time.

NEWSFLASH: Antifa has gotten city, county, and state governments to accept their actions and intentions, ban conservatives, refuse to arrest their agitators, and even refuse to prosecute their criminals who have beaten or shot at people.

And you...proved you'll do nothing. So yet more restrictive bills were proposed this week in VA and almost every other state.

But NEXT TIME for SURE!

There won’t be a revolution. They’ll take your guns. You’ll suck the Nazi cock. You’ll swear you love it.

I fucking despise you, too.