General
- Details
- Written by Michael Z Williamson
Customer Review
- Details
- Written by Michael Z Williamson
With a typical exchange with one, that mirrors thousands I've had:
Tony Alexander: red states are receiving assistance, not paying taxes. Moscow Mitch has 9 out of 10 of the counties that receive the most assistance in the country.
Hide or report this
Like
┬╖ Reply ┬╖ 3d
Mike Williamson: Tony Alexander But as a good liberal, you should enjoy helping poor people with the taxes you voted for. 
If you're opposed to the government's legitimate authority to tax, maybe you should go live in Somalia.
And even her pet boy Mueller couldn't prove ANYTHING about Russia, and is in fact being countersued for the slander.
What was that about "investigated and found no wrondoing?"
:-*
They're all in favor of helping "The poor" until they're expected to pay for it from their urban petri dishes of "culture."
- Details
- Written by Michael Z Williamson
For them, NO efforts to control the proliferation of GUNs will be acceptable. They serve their lord and master, the NRA. 
No matter that men, women, children are being slaughtered in the streets.
Doesn't look like all those (any of those) 'good guys with guns' are stepping up to protect either!!!
The rest of your bloody-shirt bleat is ignored. Especially the hilarious claim that the NRA does anything to stop gun control. They've endorsed every major federal gun control law in the last 80 years.
- Newest
 Second, per FM 23-5, the stated maximum effective range is given as 500 yards. Now, what I saw was 460 METERS, but in publications using both Imperial and Metric. I transposed. BFD. AND, the newer M16s exceed that range.
Also, just because a weapon is mechanically limited to a given range, does not mean it's impossible to shoot further. It's entirely possible. It's just that accuracy lacks.
The M1 was accepted for service at 3 MOA accuracy. That's 18" at 600 yards plus wind drift, plus rotation of the earth (And yes, that is a factor). Then, flight time is approximately 1 second, so sure, hitting paper at that range is doable, but inaccurate, and hitting a moving enemy...only by sheer luck.
Also, I own and shoot an original, complete, M1-D.
So it's your math that's challenged, as well as your reading comprehension. And if you're such an over-sensitive snowflake that a single questionable error removes 4 stars from the book and causes a meltdown of "LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!" it doesn't speak well for Marine officers. Luckily, I'm aware you're not typical.
Also, the AR platforms have been demolishing the archaic platforms at National Match for about 30 years now. 1970 was a long time ago. About the time I was 5. Technology has advanced in a half century. Witness this computer we're using.
You should probably look up an article entitled, "The M14, Not Much For Fighting ( A Case Against The M14 Legend)"
If you're that upset about my comments on the Garand, this one will cause apoplexy. But facts remain facts.